The Reverse Engineer - music blog

Electronic music blog and experimental music blog by Dave House / The Reverse Engineer. Musings on music, inspiration and life. Please explore my site for free music and more info.

You are currently browsing the archives for the minimal category.

Latest Posts

Archives

Categories


 

Join my mailing list:

 Go to the signup form

Share:

Facebook icon Twitter icon Delicious icon StumbleUpon icon Digg icon

Send to a friend:

Your name:
Friends email:
 

Archive for the ‘minimal’ Category

Reverberations: The Influence of Steve Reich – Session 6. The Barbican, 8/5/11

Sunday, May 15th, 2011

‘Epic’ barely does justice to this 6 hour concert exploring the wide ranging influence of Steve Reich. And attending just the last session meant I had the light version – some people I spoke to had been there for the entire, weekend-long programme! The evening featured 3 and a bit Reich performances, a piece by fellow New Yorker Fiona Wolfe plus full sets by Clogs, Owen Pallett and Max Richter. Things kicked off a bit later than scheduled at 6.15pm and didn’t finish until gone midnight. On a Sunday night. Phew!

A couple of Reich pieces started proceedings – first his fun Clapping Music – always enjoyable to see live, particularly when the man himself is one of the clappers – followed by You Are (Variations), performed by The Britten Sinfonia and Synergy Vocals. Not one of my favourite Reich pieces, but like with all his music it’s far richer when experienced live. To my (largely unqualified) ears this piece seems to be exploring the juxtaposition of tone and duration – something that, on a personal level, isn’t as interesting to me as his more rhythmicaly exploratative pieces. Nevertheless it was deceptively immersive and a pleasure to hear performed so well.

Next came Julia Wolfe‘s Cruel Sister. The composer herself introduced the story behind the composition – a dark tale of sibling rivalry over a mutual love interest. One sister murders the other by drowning, her body is then recovered and her rib cage and hair fashioned into a harp that is played at the surviving sister’s wedding. The music was genuinely disturbing and utterly captivating. The 2000-strong audience held a collective breath and shared many a spine-tingle as the story panned out, expertly and terrifyingly told through the voices of the orchestra. My highlight of the evening.

Owen Pallet and the Britten Sinfonia then performed Pallet’s Heartland, originally an alternative indie album of looped strings, drums and vocals. It was an ambitious performance and it took a while for the orchestra, drummer, keys, guitar and voice to find eachother, but when it worked it was soaring and satisfying.

Half way through Pallet’s set a stroppy, schoolmarmy type woman barked “we want Steve Reich!” to shocked looks all round. An outrageously selfish act that showed a lack of respect to everyone present. On the offchance that you stumble across this review, lady: shame on you.

Either way she soon got her wish as the original schedule was tweaked so that the planned finale, the London premiere of Reich’s Double Sextet was switched with Max Richter’s performance. Probably a good idea – the evening was massively overrunning and Double Sextet is what most people had come for after all. I was slightly put out as I really wanted to see Richter and by this stage I was unsure whether I’d make it to the end! Anyway, Double Sextet, peformed by Eighth Blackbird and Bang on a Can, sounded to me like fairly typical Reich: intricate, rhythmic, cyclical and hypnotic but perhaps more playful than some of his earlier work. It failed to blow me away like his career highlights (Drumming and Music for 18 Musicians in my opinion) but again it was a joy to experience live and the performers clearly enjoyed themselves immensely, which adds a lot to a performance.

Following this piece, people started reluctantly leaving – nobody was expecting such an epic concert and the Barbican had sold out of dinner-worthy food (I had to settle for nuts and a lolly, the hunt for which caused me to miss the ‘bonus’ performance of the first movement of Drumming!) Still, work the next day or not, I wasn’t going to be moved – there was music to be heard!

The penultimate performance was a curatorially misjudged set from folk-rock-indie experimentalists Clogs, playing with the New London Children’s Choir, which left a lot of blank faces. I was curious to see Clogs as their number features a member of The National, a band I’ve recently become a fan of, but I failed to see how such a folk-heavy performance tied in with the rest of the programme or showed clear influence from Reich.

Last but in many ways most exciting was Max Richter and his ensemble. The hardy few who stuck it out til the end (it was knocking midnight) settled in for what promised to be a special performance. Richter’s music is haunting, lilting and achingly beautiful – just the thing to end such an overwhelming evening! That they started with my absolute favourite On The Nature Of Daylight made it utterly worth staying so late. I surrendered to the swell and flow of the strings and piano for the next 40 minutes. I urge you to listen to Richter’s sublime album The Blue Notebooks – if there is beauty in sadness, this is what it sounds like.

From a programming point of view the evening was something of a mess. A warning that it would be so long would have been nice, the mid-session programme change frustrated as many people as it pleased and the inclusion of Clogs was somewhat baffling. But overall this was a stunning concert – 6 hours of music for the price of a standard show with all the composers present and a premiere of new music by a true innovator isn’t something one experiences very often.

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in gig review, minimal | No Comments »


 

John Cage: 4’33, Music for Piano, Indeterminacy. St.George’s Bristol, 19 April 2011.

Friday, April 22nd, 2011

‘There is no such thing as an empty space or an empty time. There is always something to see, something to hear. In fact, try as we may to make a silence, we cannot.’ – John Cage.

The 2010 campaign to get John Cage‘s 4’33 to the coveted Christmas number 1 spot in the pop charts registered on the radar of most UK music fans. 4’33 is, of course, the composers infamous 1952 reflection on the nature of music, composition and sound – four and a half minutes of apparent silence, encouraging listeners to pay attention to the ambient sounds around them. Whilst the recording didn’t hit Number One the campaign prompted debate, amusement, outrage and delight – Cage’s intention, I don’t doubt.

I have long been intrigued by Cage and while I ‘get’ 4’33 as a statement, I consider it overstated – the natural end point of a path of creative philosophising past which not much more needs to be said. It somehow shouts it’s intent through the silence. However, I adore his earlier pieces for prepared piano and other similarly rhythmic experments in extended technique. It was with curiosity, then, that I attended this performance – part of the Cage 99 series at St.George’s Bristol which celebrated the 99th anniversary of Cage’s birth rather than the 100th, echoing composer’s own convention-defying spirit.

The night started with a performance of 4’33 by pianists and improvisors Tania Chen and Steve Beresford. I want to put inverted commas around performance, but I will refrain! Hearing the piece live (again, the desire for inverted commas) added nothing to my perception of it – I still get it; I still consider it an overstatement. The self-concious opening and closing of the piano lids (the pianists only interaction with their instruments) seemed contrived to me, but I am aware that the cultural context of the 1950′s is long gone.

Straight after came a selection of pieces from Music for Piano, Cage’s series of experiments in zen-like, automatic music creation. Each piece consists of a short phrase made with the piano as a noisemaker as opose to an instrument. The body of the piano was struck, the strings were plucked and rubbed, dissonant chords were juxtaposed with individual, sweet ringing notes. There were some interesting noises and the occasional serendipitious marriage of parts hinted at a melody or rhythm. All the pieces were short, studiedly sparse and existed in their own sonic universe.

While I hate the ‘anybody could do that’ argument, I think that if you put anyone with an interest in sound in front of a grand piano and said “see what noises you can make – don’t go crazy, but have a play”, they’d come up with much the same thing. The performance left me cold, it felt like there was almost nothing to say about it. It lacked emotional context or hooks. Again, I’m aware that the time when such experiments were new and even shocking is long gone, but even so, it felt like the sonic equivalent of reading an artists notebook – preliminary ideas, ponderings on the nature of their art. Is it necessary or rewarding to perform such pieces?

After the interval the musicians were joined by alternative comic Stewart Lee, one of my favourite stand-ups. He read short stories, selected at random from a pile, while the pianists improvised sounds with their pianos and a variety of childrens toys and noisemakers. This was Indeterminacy, a seeming development of the ideas explored in Music for Piano. Some of the stories were amusing, and Lee’s deadpan delivery suited their often inconsequential, diary-like structure. Again, some of the noises made were wonderful, my particular favourite being the hand-fan held to the piano strings resulting in undulating, textured drones. It was, however, somewhat boring – a word one probably shouldn’t use in a seroius review of classical music, but there we go. The lesson of the excersize was nothing new to me.

I fear this music (inverted commas) has dated irrepearably. The ideas Cage was exploring have undoubtably and tangibly influenced much music since, but to me these very early stepping stones have little or no impact anymore – the debt to Cage needs to be respected and remembered, but more interesting things have been done since.

There were aspects of the live experience that were fascinating to me, though. One was the obvious intention of the composer for any sound to be considered a part of the performance. In post-concert discussions people were clearly trying to work out how they fitted in. It also struck me that whilst one could go anywhere where there is relative silence (a church, the countryside) and decide to scrutinise the sound and the sound alone, the very fact that a performance of Cage’s music is deliberately and directly about the sonic environment subtly but essentially changes the way one listens. A church or a hilltop holds it’s own aesthetic and personal implications. A concert hall is about sound and performance. For this reason, the relevance of Cage’s musical aesthetic will live on.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in gig review, minimal, music review | No Comments »


 

Music Review – Moritz Von Oswald Trio: Live in New York / Mirko Loko – Seventy Nine Remixes

Friday, October 22nd, 2010

A quick round up of a couple of my recent aquisitions.

Moritz von Oswald Trio: Live in New York

moritz_von_oswald_trio-live_in_new_york

Listen to Nothing 4 from Moritz von Oswald Trio Live in New York

Oh, I had high hopes for this. There it was in the record shop rack in all it’s beautifully packaged glory – double vinyl only with free CD, and a line-up that reads like a who’s who of modern techno. Moritz von Oswald of course, with regular trio-completers Vladislav Delay and Max Loderbauer, plus special guests Carl Craig and Francois K. So arguably some of the most important and innovative scene-shapers in the history of dance music.

I listened idly, then I listened properly (headphones on, lights off, no distractions), then I listened properly again. On the third listen I just had to give in and accept I don’t really like it. Vertical Ascent, the Trio’s 2009 release on which many of the loops and beats for Live in New York are based, was an interesting and engaging piece of work. Live in New York, however, meanders and drags. An improvised performance is always going to have it’s highs and lows, with some parts working and others not, but given the experience and artistry of the musicians involved I think the lows outnumber the highs here.

Some phrases far outstay their welcome relative to their sonic interest, the bell-like loop on the first track, Nothing 1, being a good example – I audibly sighed with relief when this was faded out after 6 or so minutes. Other parts sound almost cluelessly improvised, with certain synthesizer phrases nothing more than a simple, atonal scale culminating in a sustained dirge. There is a surprising lack of bass which lends the performance an air of constant build up with no peak. Not that I think all techno should be banging, bass-heavy and dancefloor friendly by any means – the genre is easily mature enough to deliver a listening experience of sound design and atmosphere – but a bit of backbone wouldn’t have gone amiss.

That said, Live in New York does have it’s moments. The musicians clearly work well off eachother and there are moments when Vladislav Delay’s live, looped percussion and the atmospheric doodles from the keyboards and samplers settle into pleasing grooves, deep textures and genuine warmth. Unfortunately, these are few and far between and not maximised.

Mirko Loko – Seventy Nine Remixes

Mirko_Loko-Seventy_Nine_Remixes

Listen to Ricardo Villalobos’ ‘Hilery’s Chant’ remix of Tahktok

Good old Cadenza (Luciano’s label) deliver another slice of forward thinking and involving minimal techno. I’m not familiar with the original, but this 12″ provides a Carl Craig and a Ricardo Villalobos remix. Can’t ask for much more than that!

Carl Craig’s ‘Soundscape’ Remix of Love Harmonic is a driving, percussive, tribal detroit workout. It doesn’t hit the highs of some of his other remix work but the soundscape elements that no doubt lend the remix it’s title add some nice dancefloor atmospherics.

It’s Villalobos’ ‘Hilery’s Chant’ remix of Tahktok that you need this record for, though. I’m a huge fan of Ricardo Villalobos and while I don’t like everything he puts out I respect him for doing his own thing and pushing the scene forward. Many of his productions are jaw-dropping dancefloor delights or intricate rhythmic epics, but rarely are they delicate and beautiful. This track, however, is both.

A sustained, sweet note carries us through most of the journey while a children’s chant ebbs and flows alongside his bubbly beats. Interest is expertly maintained over the 16 minute duration – Villalobos’ subtleties of production combined with his natural ear for a rhythmic hook are at the forefront, here. Sublime stuff, and one to file alongside early IDM, perhaps, rather than adding to the party box.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in minimal, music review, techno | 2 Comments »


 

The Reverse Engineer

Music, content & images © David House, 2010. Design by Carbonbased. | Site navigation: home about music news contact blog shop
The Reverse Engineer on: Facebook  Myspace  Soundcloud  last.fm